![If you sacrifice your freedom for security](https://loka.nahovitsyn.com/165.jpg)
![if you sacrifice your freedom for security if you sacrifice your freedom for security](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0e/23/e8/0e23e83f91bdabaf222e29164b1400b9.png)
There are many contradictions in this area, such as privacy versus wiretapping and freedom of expression in exchange for repression, where various and different opinions tend to regard armies, armies and weapons as a door to protecting the basic gains of peoples' renaissance, foremost of which is freedom. Human thought is usually confined to presenting arguments and compelling proofs only to expand its moral authority or geographic boundaries at the expense of the other. We are not going to dwell on a stereotypical view of the relationship of security with freedom, as much as we can not overlook the eternal dialectic and even the eternity between security and freedom. After the rejection of the bricast plan.Elmondo: The scenarios awaiting Britain after the rejection of the bricast.Rise in the death toll of the "youth" attack on the complex in Nairobi.If Democrats don't buck up and take back a significant number of seats in both houses quickly, I'm afraid that Bush may succeed in destroying what's left of a once great nation. They don't "hate us for our freedom," They covet our freedoms and want them all for themselves and no one else. America is giving this administration its freedoms.
![if you sacrifice your freedom for security if you sacrifice your freedom for security](https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/1600x900/1734358-Ron-Paul-Quote-If-you-sacrifice-liberty-for-security-you-will-lose.jpg)
Is it a new tactic? Break so many laws that no one can keep up with them? It seems to be working. The sheer number of laws broken and rights violated have not allowed any serious investigation or attention of any one topic. The "us or them" mentality is pitched with the strange caveat of "them is who we say it is." Bit by bit, Bushco has been chipping at our credulity in fashion of no WMD, Osama doesn't matter, voting fraud, warrantless searches and invasions of privacy are good for America. We are being told that it's good to question, but to question in a time of "war" is to undermine our troops and any chance of victory. Everything is sold as black or white with no room for shades of grey. The war against thought, individuality and creativity has been waged since the fundamentalist inspired administration first took power. It's the perfect enemy for the military industrial complex.
![if you sacrifice your freedom for security if you sacrifice your freedom for security](https://www.idlehearts.com/images/those-who-give-up-their-liberty-for-more-security-neither-deserve-liberty-nor-security.jpg)
We are already a fearful society and Bushco works hard at increasing the "fright threshold" as they bombard us daily with news of an invisible enemy with no country, face or identity. This isn't good enough, so Guantanamos are being run worldwide to circumvent constitutional rights. MOstly people of color, the poor and the disenfranchised. We already live in a nation with one of the highest per capita populations in prison known to history.
![if you sacrifice your freedom for security if you sacrifice your freedom for security](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nBK2dEXQK74/maxresdefault.jpg)
On edit, thanks to CrackpotAmerica's thread the actual quote is: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." If this "administration" successfully convinces the majority of Americans that they should willingly give up the rights that we have fought and died for so often for the perceived security of being safe from any nut case that takes it upon himself to commit an act of terror, America will most surely die an early death. Ben Franklin said it first, and the words may becoming home to roost.
![If you sacrifice your freedom for security](https://loka.nahovitsyn.com/165.jpg)